Image credit: ZDA |
Traditionally, tourism has been seen as an activity that only happens in politically stable and peaceful environments. Conflict has never been seen as one of the factors that can boost the tourism and hospitality industry. Until recently, tourism along with hospitality have been seen as activities which can mostly thrive in peaceful and politically stable environments.
Which Conflict?
By the way conflict in this context can be looked at at two levels. It can refer to differences that arise at the organisational or even industrial level, which differences can easily be settled by following conflict resolution techniques which are often codified in the grievance redress mechanisms put in place by various entities. For the purpose of this write up, we are going to focus on conflict that occurs in the external environment of the tourism business - the conflict over which the tourism industry has little or no control at all.
Tourism, Conflict and Adventure
A remarkable observation has been made that
the distribution of produced knowledge, along with the rise of more macabre forms of tourism such as conf lict tourism and disaster tourism, justifies the need for conf lict and post-conf lict management and marketing. (Isaac et al., 2019)
Lisle in Isaac et al.(2019) argues that
entanglements between conf lict and tourism ‘disrupt and resist the prevailing images of safety and danger that attempt to hold them apart.’
The above citations clearly show that there has been a shift in the way we view and conceptualize tourism due to the affinity that modern tourism seems to have for adventure, conflict and disaster. Past narratives on tourism often focused on peaceful and politically stable tourist destinations. Not any more, nowadays images of danger and adventure also tend to spur interest in quite a number of tourists and often appeal to their adventurous side.
Tourists in Unfamiliar Environments
I have always wondered why many tourists have often been abducted in politically volatile and violent locations. I thought the tourists were stupid, careless and reckless but I am beginning to come to terms with this seemingly bizarre behaviour.
In fact it has been argued that
tourists are particularly vulnerable to disasters and conflicts because they travel in unfamiliar environments, face language barriers and are difficult to account for, as they have insufficient connectedness with local communities and information channels (Becken & Hughey, 2013) in Isaac et al. (2019)
The above assertion makes a lot of sense especially when we take into account the fact that
tourism in these conf lict-ridden destinations is not considered as the primary concern, and potentially the ruling regimes primarily restrict tourists from accessing such areas, largely on the grounds that the circumstances make it unsafe for tourists.(Isaac et al. 2019)
Warner (1999) in Isaac et al.(2019) observes that
tourists who visit destinations in conf lict areas may well like to be able to form a judgement about those societies and their memories by interacting with locals and residents who are experiencing the daily life of conf -lict.
Dark Tourists
He goes on to mention that politically oriented tourists, conf lict tourists, danger-zone tourists and war tourists are considered types of ‘dark tourists’ who travel ‘to places made interesting for reasons of political dispute’.
In the light of the above assertions, it is crystal clear that for reasons best known to themselves, there is a certain category of tourists who seem to thrive in war- ridden or volatile environment. It seems to me that these dark tourists tend to get a 'high' from such miserable and unfortunate occurrences.
This reminds me of the tourist who took a photo of a child who was merely clinging to their life due to hunger. The child later died and their remains were pecked on by a vulture in the sight of the tourist!
Whatever has happened to mankind nobody knows, it seems we have been rendered insensitive by the dismal images we watch on a daily basis. It's like we find it difficult to distinguish between fiction and reality. Our daily encounters have been relegated to the experience we have when watching movies.
Motivations for Visiting Conflict Zones
Regardless of what has been discussed above, however, the decision to visit a zone of conflict whether before, during or after conflict will be made by potential visitors in the light of their motivation for such a visit. The stage of the conflict plays a very big role in making a decision under such circumstances.
According to Mitchell et al. (1997) in Isaac et al. (2019),
the motivations for visiting areas of conflict will range from personal desires for excitement and risk to those of memory and personal heritage. Markets for such forms of tourism also vary with the stage of conflict, and also by demographic and personality characteristics, as well as factors relating to family history and geographical location.
The links between visiting zones of conflict and ‘dark tourism’ are certainly present, but are far from being the dominant or only relationship and influence in the visitation of such destinations. In some cases, the ‘dark’ element is marketed as being a major attraction, but equally, more personal and lighter motives, even if associated with a sense of loss or obligation, along with basic human curiosity, probably explain the presence of the vast majority of visitors to such sites. (Isaac et al., 2019)
If we have many visitors from the dark tourist category, then we should expect a rise in the hotel or lodge occupancy rates during times of war. The tourism business would be booming during wars, catastrophes and disasters. Despite the restrictions put in place by authorities during such difficult times, a lot of revenue and the much needed foreign exchange would be flowing into the national coffers.
Voluntourism or Volunteer- tourism
Another important and emerging category of tourism is volunteer-tourism, or ‘voluntourism’, a problematic category that typically features visitors from the Global North volunteering for social or environmental causes while on holiday. (Neef and Grayman, 2019).
This type of tourism could indeed be problematic in the sense that it has a tendency of meddling in both local and international affairs that may apparently have little or even nothing to do with the 'activists' or volunteers as the case may be. Take for instance the recent developments in the Israel-Palestine and Russia- Ukraine conflict. I can say that some of the people who fight in these wars or call for an end to hostilities often enter these countries as tourists.
While some of such tourists may simply be motivated by a sense of voyeurism, others have a genuine urge to help affected communities in conflict- prone areas they go to. (Isaac et al., 2019)
Politicization of Tourism
According to Butler and Suntikul (2010) in Isaac et al.(2019),
further investigations of the connections between conf licts and danger in tourism can lead to understanding the ‘greater politicization of tourism’.
The above can be taken as an admission that there has been a lot of political interference in tourism. A lot of instances may be cited were strangers claiming to be tourists have been implicated in rather serious cases that border on political interference, especially in Africa. A case in point could be that of the recent happenings in the Democratic Republic of Congo wherein operatives from a well-known intelligence organisation were implicated in a case of attempted coup.
Hall et al. (1996) contends that,
socio-political conf licts and violence manifest themselves in different contexts such as civil or international wars, bombings, coups, terrorism attacks, assassinations, riots and revolutions.
Instability Deters Tourism Development
These forms of social and political instability are considered to be incompatible with the planning, development and management of viable and prosperous tourism. Araña & León (2008) in Isaac et al.(2019)
If anything, a tourism crisis often ensues in the aftermath of a major disaster or conflict and is often compounded by negative media coverage, which can have a damaging impact on the image of a tourist destination. Unlike natural disasters, conflicts tend to have a more intimidating effect and, more often than not, tend to scare away prospective tourists.
Many are the instances where tourism has been deterred due to threats of breakout of, or ongoing conflicts. An example can be given of Kashmir and South China Sea which, though they have some of the most attractive, picturesque and exotic tourist destinations, barely enjoy a commensurate patronage in tourist visits.
Terror Camps and Tourism Deterrence
Though social and political instability are considered inimical to the development of tourism, recent developments in this field or industry seem to contradict this view. For instance even if the Middle East is quite a volatile region when it comes to wars and terror attacks, there has been an upsurge in the number of military tourists frequenting that area. These tourists are paying huge amounts of money just to shoot at imaginary Palestinian terror targets in the fantasy terror camps that have been established in a sizable number of locations in Israel and the West Bank. The tourists are paying a lot just to act as IDF soldiers and mimic the experiences these soldiers encounter in their operations.
Isaac et al. (2019) confirms the above in the following revealing statements:
There are some niche markets which are heading to destinations not despite conf lict, but because of conf lict.
There has been the emergence of morbid fantasy ‘terror camps’ in Israel and the West Bank (Palestine) as new forms of dark military tourism. Centering on scenarios of apprehending and killing fictional terrorists, who resemble Palestinian Arabs, the activity provides global tourists a chance to play the role of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers in dramatic situations.
Social and political instability is not a factor to take into account when it comes to military tourism. As such, the hospitality industry is likely to be doing fine in war- prone countries. I should think there are a lot of war or military tourists in such hotspots as Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East. The hospitality industry must be making a lot of money from such patrons.
Connection Between Tourism and Conflict
Isaac et al.(2019) observe that
the core relationship between tourism and border conf lict and territoriality includes conf lict as a deterrent, tourism growth in spite of conf lict, conf lict as attraction, tourism as a catalyst for peace, tourism as a cause of hostility, tourism as a propaganda tool and tourism as a legal justification for territorial claims.
This revealing statement clearly shows, in a nutshell, the connection that exists between tourism and conflict. It points out that conflict can discourage tourism or encourage it, of course this depends on the objectives of the tourists - patrons to conflict zones. In instances where tourism is fostered, conflict may be regarded as a major attraction and tourists as spectators or even actors or instigators in the arena of war.
The excitement and thrill of the possible risk of visiting zones of war are two of the reasons why some tourists visit such places in spite of the danger posed to their lives.
As such tourism can be regarded as a cause of hostilities and can even be used as a propaganda tool both before and during conflict or even after conflict. For conflict of interest between governments and citizens, most frequently the indigenous people, governments have often used tourism as a legal justification for territorial claims.
Tourism a Catalyst for Peace
Tourism can also serve as a catalyst for peace in post war situations where people need to work towards a common goal for mutual benefit. This is what was observed in a case study that was conducted in Myanmar were
informal, facilitated meetings during the initial phase of the case study on tourism and peace provided a platform for previously rival stakeholders to convene and work towards a common goal of development of tourism in a post-conf lict area in Kayin State (Isaac et al., 2019)
When seeking to empower communities in conflict-affected areas by using tourism as a tool, it is essential to emphasize and act based on the principle of priority and sustainability.
This implies that there is need to prioritize areas that are badly hit by war or similar occurrences. Nevertheless, it has been observed that areas of little or no tourism value are often neglected and often come last on the priority list. Such an approach is not likely to promote sustainable solutions to the problem of conflict. In most instances, such an approach tends to exacerbate disparities within the community and may likely lead to more divisions.
In contrast, to avoid growing disparities and promote peace, community spirit and social cohesion are values that should be sought.
Linkages Between Tourism and Conflict
According to Neef and Grayman (2019), linkages between tourism and conflict include the idea that tourism can be a force for peace and stability, the niche status of danger zone or dark heritage tourism, the concept of phoenix tourism in post-conflict destination rebranding, tourism and cultural conflicts, and tourism’s conflicts over land and resources.
The above quote sheds more light on the purported annex among the identified factors of tourism, hospitality and conflict. As I have already shown the relationship between some of the factors highlighted in the above quote, I will only focus on those that have not been addressed and will only supplement the views already discussed where it will be deemed necessary.
Conflict of Cultures
Tourists often come from varying cultural backgrounds compared to those of their host countries. As the saying goes, one man's food is another man's poison, there will always be several instances of conflict between tourists and their hosts. Of course the immediate point of contact between the tourists and the host 'culture' are people who work in the hospitality industry. Those who work in hotels and lodges need to always bear in mind that they work in a diverse environment and would do well to be sensitive and accommodative to their visitors if they are to prevent or minimise conflict.
Force for Peace and Stability
Just by the mere fact that tourism has often been against war and instability is reason enough to believe that it has a tendency to promote peace and stability in countries that could otherwise might be at war. Of late there have been a proliferation of activists in various areas that have to do with the collective well-being of mankind. There has been a trend whereby citizens of other nations protest the misdeeds of other nations like it was not long ago when South Africa protested against the war crimes perpetrated by Israel against the Palestinian population, or when NATO countries protested against the Russian offensive against Ukraine. Disguised as tourists or under the same pretext, foreign nationals have been volunteering to fight in these wars or have gone these countries to fight as mercenaries.
Destination Rebranding
Destination rebranding which is often practiced under phoenix tourism during postwar times is aimed at putting former areas of conflict in the limelight in a bid to attract tourists. One feature of rebranding under phoenix tourism is the use of narratives and presentations associated with conflict. In such situations, it can be said that the history of conflict is a major ingredient in post conflict marketing campaigns. A history of conflict can therefore be said to be the main magnet in post war rebranding and hence promotes the image of the tourism sites being thus promoted.
Legacy of Mass- tourism
There have also been claims, which seem to be true to some extent, that mass tourism has contributed to dispossession and displacement of indigenous communities and ethnic minorities, environmental pollution, conflicts over the use of natural resources, as well as political and socioeconomic inequality in many host coun-tries, particularly in the so-called ‘developing world’ (Farmaki, 2017; Gurtner, 2016 in Isaac et al. 2019).
Tourism development projects, moreover, have often led to the dispossession and mass- displacement of ethnic minorities and indigenous populations in some regions. The creation of tourist spots like the Kariba dam and a number of national parks and game management areas often meant dispossession, mass relocation, restrictions in terms of movement and even loss of livelihoods on the part of indigenous populations which lived in close proximity to such areas.
There is need therefore, on the part of tourism planners, human rights activists and other stakeholders to prioritize, or call for a more humane and inclusive approach to tourism development that maximises benefits for local people and minimises social and environmental costs; if the above trend is to be checked.
Final Thought
In conclusion, the nexus that exists amongst tourism, conflict and hospitality is quite complex and quite unpredictable due to variations in the characteristics and objectives of people who frequent various tourism destinations. As such, it is not easy to come up with a general rule that connects these seemingly contradictory facets of the tourism industry. However, the dark aspect of conflicts and wars seems to be the major attraction and hence the major link that connects tourism, hospitality and conflict especially when we take into account the macabre forms of tourism that have characterized this industry in recent times, as explained above.
As such the relationship among the three factors is such that tourism can be regarded as a cause of conflict, a legal justification for territorial claims, or as a propaganda tool before or during war times. Conflict itself can in turn serve as a pull factor for tourism and hence for the hospitality industry, or something that scares them away depending on the nature of tourists in question.
Neef and Grayman (2019) sum it all by saying,
linkages between tourism and conflict include the idea that tourism can be a force for peace and stability, the niche status of danger zone or dark heritage tourism, the concept of phoenix tourism in post-conflict destination rebranding, tourism and cultural conflicts, and tourism’s conflicts over land and resources.
It is expected, though, that with an increase in knowledge in this area due to in-depth future research, a number of additional connections will be unraveled.
References
1. Isaac R. K., Çakmak E. and Butler R. (2019) (editors)Tourism and Hospitality in Conf lict-Ridden Destinations
Oxon: Routledge2 Park Square
2. Neef A. & Grayman J. H.(2019) (Editors)The Tourism–Disaster–Conflict Nexus
Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited